Sustainability for the Media Do GroupClimate Change Adaptation
Endorsement Announcement for TCFD*1 Recommendations
The Company expressed support for the TCFD recommendations in June 2024 and joined the TCFD Consortium*2. Starting in August 2024, we began disclosing information based on the TCFD framework. We will continue to enhance the content of our disclosures.
1. Governance
The Sustainability Promotion Committee will play a central role in promoting our response to climate change issues under the materiality “Preservation and optimal use of natural capital.” For more information on our sustainability promotion system, please refer to this page.
In disclosing information in line with TCFD recommendations, a project team led by the executive officer in charge of the materiality “Preservation and optimal use of natural capital.” has been established under the Sustainability Promotion Committee to collect information on the actual situation and discuss future initiatives.
In addition, to promote management that is integrated with ESG, the Company considers each individual's contribution to qualitative items, including ESG-related items, from the perspective of sustainable growth and medium- to long-term improvement of corporate value when allocating individual stock-based compensation to executive directors.
For details on executive compensation, please refer to Corporate Governance “Executive compensation”.
2. Strategy
For the fiscal year ended February 2024, we conducted a scenario analysis to understand the impact (risks and opportunities) on the Group and its businesses, assuming changes in the business environment caused by climate change. This analysis was based on energy consumption data from the Company, its co-located three subsidiaries, and MEDIA DO TECH TOKUSHIMA Co., Ltd., as well as information on locations of the Company and all consolidated subsidiaries. In analyzing scenarios, we evaluated the financial impact, focusing on the 1.5°C scenario, which is the target of the Paris Agreement, and the 4°C scenario, in which global warming progresses without countermeasures. As a result, while there could be significant business opportunities due to the growth of the eBook market, we calculated the financial impact in terms of increased operating and procurement costs and losses due to severe natural disasters.
Referenced Climate Change Scenarios and Evaluation Criteria*3
| Transition Risk Risks associated with the transition to a decarbonized economy |
Physical Risk Physical risks arising from climate change |
Assumed Scenarios | Evaluation Criteria | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5℃ Scenario |
IEA WEO 2019 (SDS) IEA WEO 2023 (APS NZE) |
IPCC AR5 (RCP2.6) | A scenario in which more stringent climate change measures than those currently in place would limit the increase in the Earth’s average temperature to 1.5°C to 2°C in 2100 compared to pre-industrial levels |
Time Frame
Impact Level
|
| 4℃ Scenario |
IEA WEO 2023 (STEPS) | IPCC AR5 (RCP8.5) | A scenario in which, without policies exceeding current warming measures, the Earth’s average temperature is expected to rise by approximately 4°C by 2100 compared to pre-industrial levels |
Risks and Opportunities for Business Activities
| Risks | Concrete Example | Scenario | Time Line | Degree of Impact | Risk Avoidance/Reduction-focused Initiatives Conducted by the Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5℃ | 4℃ | ||||||
| Transition risks |
Measures/regulations |
|
✓ (-3.1 million yen) |
✓ (+0.4 million yen) |
Medium- to long-term | Minimal |
|
| Market |
|
✓ | ✓ | Short- to long-term | Moderate |
|
|
|
✓ | ✓ | Long-term | Minimal |
|
||
| Physical risks | Physical(Acute) |
|
✓ | Medium- to long-term | Moderate |
|
|
|
✓ (-1.21 million yen) |
✓ (-3.31 million yen) |
Medium- to long-term | Minimal |
|
||
| Physical(Chronic) |
|
✓ (-0.1 million yen) |
✓ (-0.1 million yen) |
Medium- to long-term | Minimal |
|
|
| Opportunities | Concrete Example | Scenario | Time Line | Degree of Impact | Opportunity Acquisition-focused Initiatives Conducted by the Group |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5℃ | 4℃ | ||||||
| Transition Opportunities | Technology | Promotion of digital transformation: increased demand in digital content contributing to carbon reduction | ✓ | Long-term | Large |
|
|
| Market | Increased demand in sustainable products: increased demand in paperless content | ✓ | Short- to long-term | Large | |||
| Physical Opportunities | Physical(Chronic) | Rise in average temperatures: increased demand in eBooks due to growing stay-at-home consumption | ✓ | Medium- to long-term | Moderate |
|
|
3. Risk Management
The Company has established “Risk Management Regulations” for the purpose of controlling the occurrence of risks and minimizing the company’s losses. Based on these regulations, the Sustainability Promotion Committee takes the lead in identifying, assessing, and taking countermeasures against risks that may affect sustainable growth and business activities, including climate change issues. The results of the risk assessment are reported to the Board of Directors, which determines the priority of risks to be addressed and directs the implementation of countermeasures after examining and considering the relative relevance of the risks from the management perspective.
For more details about Risk Management, please refer to this page.
4. Metrics and Targets
The Group calculates and discloses GHG emissions (Scope 1 and 2) as part of its efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from business activities. We will continue to expand the calculation boundary to include our subsidiaries and Scope 3, while examining specific initiatives toward achieving our medium- to long-term targets.
Medium- to Long-Term Targets for GHG Emission Reductions
As medium- to long-term targets, the Group has set the following:
MEDIA DO Group GHG Emission Reduction Targets (Scope 1 and 2)
| FY2030 | 50% reduction compared with FY2023 |
|---|---|
| FY2050 | Net-zero emissions |
We recognize that engagement with suppliers will be essential in achieving these targets, and we are examining specific initiatives and the development of frameworks to support this effort. As a first step, we will work to calculate and disclose total GHG emissions including Scope 3.
GHG Emissions Results
| Item | Category | Emissions(t-CO2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY22/2 | FY23/2 | FY24/2 | FY25/2 | ||
| Scope1 | Direct emissions from on-site fuel use and other company activities | 5.5 | 5.0 | 4.2 | 4.0 |
| Scope2 (location-based) | Indirect emissions from purchased electricity | 132.9 | 145.5 | 169.2 | 158.1 |
| Scope2 (market-based) | 135.9 | 152.9 | 153.6 | 162.5 | |
| Scope1+Scope2 (location-based) |
− | 138.3 | 150.5 | 173.4 | 162.1 |
| Scope1+Scope2 (market-based) |
− | 141.4 | 157.9 | 157.8 | 166.4 |
Location-based: Calculated using average emission factors of the regions where target sites are located
Market-based: Calculated taking into account contracted electricity plans and renewable energy certificates
For all figures, please refer to ESG Highlights.
- Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures
The final report, published in 2017, recommends that companies disclose information related to climate change risks and opportunities in four areas: governance, strategy, risk management, and indicators and targets. - TCFD Consortium was established in May 2019 as a forum for companies and financial institutions that endorse the TCFD Recommendations to work together to promote initiatives, and to discuss effective corporate disclosure and initiatives to link disclosed information to appropriate investment decisions by financial institutions and others. After the dissolution of the TCFD in October 2023, membership in the Consortium will enable members to express their endorsement of the TCFD recommendations.
- The numbers appearing in parentheses show the financial impact calculated.